Blues tuning for 12-hole "diatonic" harp

Anything apart from the two mainstream default harmonicas (Solo-tuned fully-valved chromatic, and un-valved Richter 10-hole diatonic). Alternate tunings, different construction, new functionality, interesting old designs, wishful-thinking... whatever!
Post Reply
IaNerd
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:42 pm
Location: Iowa, USA

Blues tuning for 12-hole "diatonic" harp

Post by IaNerd » Sun Sep 10, 2017 5:33 pm

NAME: Not sure yet.

BASIC CONCEPT: A 12-hole slant harp with a "standard" Richter left side, and a right side where every “blues scale” note has at least one unbent draw or blow spot PLUS an enharmonic twin that is a fully-bent draw note.

WHEN/HOW: September of 2017. I have not yet had one made.

LAYOUT AND DETAILS:

Notes of the Blues Scale in G: G — A#/Bb — C — C#/Db — D — F — G

I Gmaj yes (x2), one with 7th
ii Amin no
iii Bmin yes, partial
IV Cmaj yes (x3)
V Dmaj no
vi Emin yes, partial
vii F#dim no

**FUN FACT** There are 192 pathways from the lowest blues scale note up to the highest (or vice versa), and 36,864 pathways up-and-then-down (or vice versa) all the blues scale notes.

Image
Attachments
2017-09-10 (5).png
2017-09-10 (5).png (94.95 KiB) Viewed 187 times

IaNerd
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:42 pm
Location: Iowa, USA

Re: Blues tuning for 12-hole "diatonic" harp

Post by IaNerd » Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:56 pm

Addendum #1: This entire tuning could be bumped up by one octave. The result would be a left half which for many people would be easier to bend, but possibly a right half that is harder to bend.

As a compromise, a tuning like this could be reentrant, as follows.

Raise channels 1-6 by one octave. Change 7 blow to G, but do NOT raise channels 7-12 by an octave. Now we have the same sort of tuning but with a shorter voice and--for some folks--easier to play.

Post Reply