
Triona: Take your time. I understand this might take some time to get your head around

Brendan: Thanks for the feedback! I'm glad to hear you like it

And yes, I agree it's pretty unorthodox. I'm convinced our habit of thinking of harmonica scales as being naturally alternating between blow and draw notes is based on the diatonic harmonica's history as a chord instrument. Chords tend to contain roughly every other note, so if you want the instrument to also be able to play a scale it's a very natural solution. Richter tuning makes a lot of melody-playing sacrifices to keep the large blow chord and the large major fifth in the bottom, including the inverted breathing pattern at the top and the missing notes at the bottom, but it's for the good cause of keeping the chords. When solo tuned chromatics was being invented, someone simply made the smallest possible adjustment to this chord-centric instrument to allow it to play every note: Take the melodically least awkward octave of the chord instrument, repeat it, and add the remaining notes with a button without worrying too much about playability. The design stuck, especially once Toots and the others had showed that it's possible to play complex music with it. What we ended up with was an instrument that's supposedly focused on playing melodies in any key (purists still vigorously maintain that a C-tuned chromatic is the only one you need!), but which really is a hacked version of an instrument still burdened by the sacrifices made to make it a better chord instrument. All this while really only having one usable major chord.
The point I'm trying to make is this: if we are not prioritising the chords anyway, why not go all the way? I'm not so arrogant as to claim I've found the most logical solution, I simply suggest a philosophy of trying to determine what qualities one wants in a tuning and then try to maximise those qualities by any means necessary.
Just before I found this tuning, was trying to maximise the number of notes where one could make a trill in a single extended minor scale. For a Dm harp, I wanted quick changes between adjacent notes in the sequence D-E-F-G-A-Bb-C-D, but also between notes in the sequence A-B-C#-D, and somewhere I needed the notes F# and G# since they appear frequently as accidentals. I had spent years trying to think up an alternate design of the slide diatonic, and had just discovered that in my latest design (one of the few that was actually realised) I could save space by using more jaw flicks to make trills. I woke up early one morning 2018 and sat down with pen and paper to draw the graphs of relationships between notes, as I had been doing for a long time, when I realised I could just put the notes on a row! This would solve the problem, which as this point was pretty much abstracted to mathematics, and my key specific tuning suddenly worked in many keys!
It required hard work and some luck, as I also had the implicit assumptions of "how a harmonica tuning should look like" in my head, but I don't think I would have found this solution without being very clear about exactly what I was looking for.
Anyhow. Enough waffling. I'll make another post that's more to the point.